Some Chinese who rebel against their authoritarian government line up with libertarian thinking of small government and individual autonomy, and are turned off by what many Republicans term cancel culture and identity politics.

3번 보니까 이해되네.

cancel culture

identity politics 

이 두 개의 개념이 없었으니까 what 이하가 뭔소린지 몰랐네.

Cancel culture: “Cancel culture” is a term used to describe the practice of withdrawing support, often publicly, from individuals, companies, or institutions due to behavior or statements perceived as objectionable or offensive. This phenomenon primarily takes place on social media, where people may “call out” someone’s actions, leading to boycotts or social and professional consequences for the person or entity involved.

Critics of cancel culture argue that it promotes a form of mob justice, often without allowing for due process or balanced dialogue, and can disproportionately harm people without considering context or the possibility of personal growth. Supporters, however, see it as a form of accountability, particularly for powerful individuals or institutions that would otherwise evade consequences for harmful behavior.

The concept has sparked significant debate about free speech, accountability, and the impacts of digital activism in modern society.

identity politics: Identity politics refers to the political stance or ideology that emphasizes the interests and perspectives of groups with which people identify, often along lines such as race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, and nationality. The central idea of identity politics is that social and political structures, historically built by dominant groups, have marginalized various minority identities. By organizing around shared identity-based experiences, individuals in these groups can advocate for social, economic, and political rights that address their unique challenges.

Supporters of identity politics argue that it empowers marginalized communities by giving them a collective voice, drawing attention to issues like discrimination, systemic inequality, and cultural recognition. Critics, however, argue that focusing too heavily on identity-based issues can lead to social fragmentation and exclusion, as it may overlook common ground across different groups or fuel division in public discourse.

The term gained prominence in the 1970s alongside the civil rights, feminist, and LGBTQ+ movements, which advocated for equal rights and social justice based on collective identity. Today, identity politics remains a significant influence in contemporary social and political debates.