The two poems I've chosen, "If I were a sheep" and "Five ways to kill a man", basically suggest strong feelings on human about what cruel things they have been done for their own greedy benefits.  Firstly, from the quotes "I'd poison the eaters of lamb" and "You can make him carry a plank of wood to the top of a hill and nail him to it", you can see that both poems imply some kinds of violent actions involving human into the death.  Which means that either an animal or human, their life has been disrupted or damaged by certain people so they wanted to express their feelings aggressively.  Secondly, in "if I were a sheep" poem you can see people make sweaters, mutton meats, and rugs from sheeps, and in "Five ways to kill a man" poem, you can see that human's form of killing or wars have changed as the period went.  This is depicting that human does not really care about what are being harmful but things they are benefiting.  Naturally, animals will be in danger and our environment will be serioulsy damaged due to mass number of killing animals and nuclear develpoment.  People need to realize our situation and stop violently afftecting nature before we are in critical danger.  Next, one of the differences between the two poems is that "If I were a sheep" poem relies on a view of non-human object who tends to be a sheep whereas "Five ways to kill a man" poem is based on a view of a person.  When I read "If I were a sheep" poem through, it felt like a sheep was a real and grumbling at human offensively.  Then, when I read the second poem,  it was more likely a satire on history of human from the past.  Therefore, after reading two poems, I felt absoultely different in how they depicted.  Finally, 아직 많이 허접합니다...여러곳 다듬어 주세요;; 추가할부분도 봐주시고요 ㅜㅜ